Posts

Why Most Creative Problem Solving Training Gets the Learner's Model Dead Wrong

Related Articles:

Three weeks ago, I walked into a boardroom in Adelaide where the CEO had just spent $47,000 on creative problem solving training for his executive team. The whiteboard was still covered in mind maps and sticky notes from their "breakthrough innovation session." Not a single practical outcome in sight.

"So what did you actually learn?" I asked the marketing director.

She shuffled through her handouts. "Well, we learned about the learner's model for creative problem solving. It's got these stages - preparation, incubation, illumination, and verification."

Right there. That's the problem with 84% of creativity training in Australian businesses today.

The Learner's Model Nobody Actually Learns From

Here's what drives me mental about how most trainers teach the creative problem solving learner's model: they treat it like a bloody recipe. Step one, gather information. Step two, let your mind wander. Step three, wait for the lightbulb moment. Step four, test your brilliant idea.

Rubbish.

After seventeen years of running innovation workshops from Cairns to Hobart, I can tell you the learner's model isn't a linear process you follow like assembling IKEA furniture. It's more like learning to ride a bike while juggling - messy, unpredictable, and absolutely nothing like the neat diagrams suggest.

The real learner's model? It's about developing the cognitive flexibility to jump between different thinking modes without getting stuck in analysis paralysis. Most corporate training completely misses this point.

What Uber Drivers Know That Most Executives Don't

Last month, my Uber driver in Melbourne solved a routing problem that had been driving him mad for weeks. Peak hour traffic through the CBD was killing his earnings, so he started experimenting with alternative routes during different times. Not rocket science, right?

But here's the thing - he was unconsciously using the learner's model perfectly. He prepared by studying traffic patterns on his app. He incubated ideas during quiet periods between rides. His illumination came when he realised certain back streets were consistently faster at specific times. Then he verified by tracking his earnings over two weeks.

No expensive training. No facilitator with a laser pointer. Just natural problem-solving instincts that most of us had before corporate environments trained them out of us.

The learner's model isn't something you need to learn - it's something you need to remember how to trust.

The Preparation Stage: Where Most Teams Get It Wrong

Traditional training tells you preparation means gathering all available information before moving forward. I used to believe this myself until a client in Perth proved me wrong.

Their product development team spent three months researching market trends, competitor analysis, and customer surveys before attempting to solve their packaging problem. Meanwhile, their warehouse team had already figured out a solution by simply organising work priorities differently and testing ideas with actual products.

Real preparation in the learner's model isn't about information hoarding. It's about building the right mental frameworks and having diverse experiences to draw from. The warehouse team succeeded because they had hands-on experience with the actual problem, not because they had more data.

This is why I always tell managers: if you want creative problem solving, get your people away from their desks. Send them to talk to customers. Have them work in different departments. Let them fail at something completely unrelated to their job.

Incubation Isn't Meditation (Thank God)

The incubation stage gets butchered worse than a backyard barbecue by inexperienced hosts. Most trainers present it as this mystical process where you clear your mind and wait for inspiration to strike.

Complete nonsense.

Incubation is your subconscious mind making connections while you're consciously focused on something else. It happens when you're arguing with your teenage daughter about screen time, or when you're stuck in traffic cursing the roadworks on the M1.

I've solved more client problems while grocery shopping in Woolworths than I ever have sitting in meditation pose trying to "incubate solutions." Your brain needs distraction, not concentration, during this phase.

The problem with modern workplaces is we don't give people enough varied mental stimulation. Everyone's either in meetings or staring at screens. No wonder innovative thinking feels forced and artificial.

Want better incubation? Encourage people to take proper lunch breaks. Let them work from different locations. Stop scheduling back-to-back meetings that eliminate any mental processing time.

Illumination: The Moment Everyone Misunderstands

Here's where the learner's model gets really interesting, and where most corporate training completely loses the plot.

Illumination isn't a single "eureka!" moment. It's usually a series of smaller insights that build on each other. Think of it like assembling a jigsaw puzzle - you don't suddenly see the complete picture, you gradually recognise patterns that help you place more pieces.

I was working with a mining company in WA last year when their safety coordinator had what seemed like a brilliant illumination about reducing workplace accidents. She wanted to implement a complex new reporting system based on her insight about human behaviour patterns.

But when we broke down her "moment of inspiration," we discovered it was actually three separate realisations spread over six weeks: first, that accident reports weren't being read by the right people; second, that workers were avoiding reporting near-misses; and third, that the current system was too complicated for people working 12-hour shifts.

Her solution worked because she recognised these as connected insights, not because she had one perfect moment of clarity.

The Verification Trap That Kills Innovation

This is where I get properly fired up about how the learner's model gets taught wrong.

Most training presents verification as the final stage where you test whether your creative solution actually works. But that's like saying cooking ends when you put the food on the plate. Wrong. Dead wrong.

Verification in creative problem solving is iterative. You test, adjust, test again, completely change direction, test something else, combine elements from failed attempts, test again. It's messy and frustrating and absolutely nothing like the neat conclusion most frameworks suggest.

I watched a Brisbane marketing team spend eight weeks "verifying" a campaign concept that should have been tested and modified within days. They were so attached to their original illumination that they forgot verification is meant to improve ideas, not just validate them.

The best creative problem solvers I know treat verification like brainstorming and idea creation training - it's an active, generative process that often produces better solutions than the original problem-solving attempt.

What Actually Works: The Messy Reality

After hundreds of workshops and probably thousands of conversations with frustrated managers, here's what I've learned about the learner's model that actually helps people solve problems creatively:

The stages aren't sequential. You'll jump between preparation and illumination, or cycle through incubation and verification multiple times for the same problem. This isn't a sign you're doing it wrong - it's a sign you're doing it right.

Different people naturally excel at different stages. Some folks are brilliant at preparation but struggle with incubation. Others have constant insights but hate the verification grind. The smartest teams recognise these differences and leverage them instead of forcing everyone through identical processes.

Context matters more than methodology. The learner's model works differently when you're solving technical problems versus people problems, short-term issues versus strategic challenges, familiar situations versus completely new territory.

Most importantly: the learner's model isn't something you can force or schedule. You can create conditions that support it, but you can't mandate creative insights any more than you can mandate falling in love.

The Australian Advantage Nobody Talks About

Here's something I've noticed working with international clients that makes me proud to be Australian: we're naturally good at the informal aspects of the learner's model.

Our culture of "having a yarn" over coffee creates perfect conditions for preparation and incubation. We share problems casually, we listen to different perspectives, we're not precious about appearing to have all the answers.

The problem comes when we try to formalise this into corporate training programs. Suddenly everyone's uncomfortable and self-conscious about being creative on command.

I've had more success teaching the learner's model through informal problem solving and decision making sessions that feel like structured conversations rather than training workshops. People relax, they share real problems, they build on each other's ideas naturally.

Why Most Training Fails (And What Works Instead)

The fundamental mistake in creative problem solving training is treating the learner's model like a technical skill you can master through practice exercises. It's not. It's more like developing good judgment - it requires experience, reflection, and the confidence to trust your instincts.

You can't learn the learner's model by working through hypothetical scenarios about improving widget production or increasing customer satisfaction. Those sanitised problems don't trigger the emotional engagement that drives real creative thinking.

What works is bringing actual business problems into the training environment. Problems where the stakes matter, where people have skin in the game, where the solutions will actually be implemented.

I remember a session with a Sydney logistics company where we worked on their real scheduling nightmare instead of pretend case studies. The energy was completely different. People brought expertise and passion and frustration - all the messy human elements that fuel genuine problem solving.

The Psychology Nobody Mentions

Here's what most learner's model training completely ignores: creative problem solving is fundamentally about managing uncertainty and ambiguity. Most people hate this feeling and will rush to premature solutions just to escape the discomfort.

The learner's model only works when people can tolerate not knowing the answer while they work through the process. This is a psychological skill, not a cognitive technique.

I've seen brilliant analytical minds completely shut down during the incubation stage because they couldn't handle the lack of clear progress. I've watched natural innovators abandon good ideas during verification because they couldn't cope with iterative failure.

Teaching the learner's model without addressing these emotional and psychological barriers is like teaching swimming without mentioning water.

The Real ROI of Getting This Right

When teams genuinely understand and apply the learner's model properly, the results are remarkable. Not because they follow a better process, but because they develop genuine problem-solving confidence.

They stop waiting for perfect information before starting (preparation paralysis). They give their subconscious minds permission to work on problems in the background (effective incubation). They recognise and build on partial insights instead of dismissing them (practical illumination). They iterate solutions rapidly instead of defending initial ideas (productive verification).

More importantly, they start seeing problems as opportunities for creative engagement rather than stressful obstacles to be minimised.

This attitude shift changes everything. Suddenly you have teams that actively seek out challenging problems because they trust their ability to work through them creatively. Customer complaints become innovation opportunities. Process breakdowns become system improvement projects. Market changes become competitive advantages.

That's the real value of the learner's model - not as a problem-solving technique, but as a framework for developing organisational resilience and adaptability.

Moving Forward: What This Means for Your Team

If you're responsible for developing creative problem-solving capabilities in your organisation, forget everything you think you know about training the learner's model.

Start with real problems. Create psychological safety for uncertainty and experimentation. Recognise that different people contribute differently to the creative process. Focus on building confidence rather than following procedures.

And for the love of all that's holy, stop trying to schedule creativity into 90-minute workshop sessions.

The learner's model is something people live, not something they learn. Your job is creating an environment where it can flourish naturally, not forcing it into artificial frameworks that drain all the life out of genuine innovation.

The companies getting this right aren't the ones with the most sophisticated training programs. They're the ones where people feel safe to be curious, supported to experiment, and trusted to learn from their mistakes.

That's the real learner's model. Everything else is just expensive consultancy theatre.