Blog
The Art of Creative Problem Solving: Why Your Business Needs More Painters, Not More Engineers
Related Reading:
Three weeks ago, I watched a mechanical engineer spend forty-seven minutes trying to fix a jammed photocopier in our Melbourne office. Forty-seven minutes. Of methodical button pressing, manual reading, and systematic troubleshooting.
Then Sarah from accounts walked over, gave it one solid thump on the side, and the thing started working perfectly.
That's the difference between linear problem solving and creative problem solving, and it's exactly why most Australian businesses are stuck in first gear when they should be flying down the highway.
The Death of Common Sense
Here's what nobody wants to admit: we've engineered the creativity right out of our problem-solving processes. Every workplace I consult for has the same issue - teams that can follow a flowchart beautifully but can't think their way out of a wet paper bag when something unexpected happens.
I blame the consultants. Not all of them, mind you, but the ones who've convinced every business owner from Cairns to Hobart that there's a "correct" methodology for everything. Six Sigma this, Lean that, frameworks coming out of their ears.
Don't get me wrong - I love a good framework. But when your entire team thinks the only way to solve a problem is through a predetermined set of steps, you've essentially turned them into very expensive robots.
What Creative Problem Solving Actually Looks Like
Real creative problem solving isn't about brainstorming sessions with sticky notes (though those have their place). It's about developing what I call "cognitive flexibility" - the ability to approach the same problem from completely different angles.
Take Bunnings, for example. Someone there looked at the traditional hardware store model and thought, "What if we made this place somewhere families actually want to spend their Saturday morning?" Sausage sizzles. Playgrounds. Wide aisles perfect for weekend projects. That's not following the retail playbook - that's rewriting it entirely.
The best creative problem solvers I know share three characteristics that you can't learn from any creative problem solving training course, though formal training certainly doesn't hurt:
They question assumptions religiously. While everyone else accepts that "this is how we've always done it," they're asking "but why?" Every procedure, every policy, every "because that's the rule" gets examined.
They steal ideas from completely unrelated industries. The most innovative solutions I've seen come from people who look at how restaurants handle queues, or how airlines manage logistics, or how video games keep users engaged, then apply those principles to totally different contexts.
They're comfortable with temporary failure. This is the big one. Creative problem solving requires trying things that might not work, and most Australian business culture is still way too risk-averse for that.
The Collaboration Myth
Everyone bangs on about collaboration being the key to creative problem solving. Teams! Workshops! Diverse perspectives!
Rubbish.
Well, mostly rubbish. Here's what I've learned after fifteen years of running problem solving workshops: the best creative solutions usually come from one person having a brilliant insight, then using the team to refine and implement it.
The collaboration comes in the execution, not the creation. Too many cooks don't just spoil the broth - they prevent anyone from even starting to cook because they're all arguing about ingredients.
That said, you do need different types of thinkers involved. I always tell clients to build problem-solving teams with at least one person who asks "what if we tried the opposite?" and one person who asks "what's the worst that could happen?" Balance out all that enthusiastic blue-sky thinking with some healthy pessimism.
The Technology Trap
Every second business I work with thinks their problem-solving issues will be fixed by better software. Project management tools, collaboration platforms, AI-powered analytics - they're throwing technology at problems that are fundamentally human.
Here's a radical thought: sometimes the best problem-solving tool is a whiteboard and a conversation.
I worked with a logistics company in Brisbane last year that spent $40,000 on optimization software to improve their delivery routes. Didn't make a dent in their efficiency problems. Then one of their drivers mentioned during a coffee break that they could save twenty minutes per route by starting pickups from the eastern suburbs first thing in the morning to avoid school traffic.
Cost of that solution? Zero dollars and one conversation.
Technology should amplify human creativity, not replace it. But too many managers think they can automate their way out of problems that require genuine human insight.
Building a Problem-Solving Culture
The companies that excel at creative problem solving don't just train their people - they create environments where creative thinking is expected, not exceptional.
At Virgin Australia (back when they were doing well), cabin crew were encouraged to come up with their own solutions for passenger complaints rather than following scripts. Result? Better customer satisfaction and employees who actually enjoyed problem-solving instead of dreading it.
Google's famous "20% time" policy wasn't really about giving people free time - it was about normalizing the idea that looking for better ways to do things was part of everyone's job description, not just management's.
But here's where most Australian businesses get it wrong: they want the innovation without the tolerance for mistakes. You can't have creative problem solving in a culture where the first question after something goes wrong is "who's responsible for this?"
The Speed Problem
Modern business moves too fast for traditional problem-solving methods. By the time you've done your root cause analysis and formed your cross-functional team and run your pilot program, your competitor has already solved the same problem and moved on to the next one.
Creative problem solving is faster problem solving. Not because you skip steps, but because you're working with a broader toolkit from the start.
Instead of methodically testing Solution A, then Solution B, then Solution C, creative problem solvers are thinking: "What would happen if we combined elements of A and C? What if we approached this like Netflix would? What would this look like if we weren't afraid of annoying our biggest customer?"
The Real Cost of Uncreative Problem Solving
Here's what keeps me awake at night: most Australian businesses are solving yesterday's problems with yesterday's methods while tomorrow's problems are already knocking on the door.
Climate change, demographic shifts, technology disruption, supply chain volatility - these aren't problems you can framework your way through. They require genuine creativity, intellectual flexibility, and the courage to try solutions that have never been tested before.
The companies that thrive over the next decade won't be the ones with the best processes. They'll be the ones with people who can look at a completely new type of problem and figure out a completely new type of solution.
And honestly? That's not a skill you develop in a two-day workshop. It's a mindset you build over months and years of encouraging people to think differently, rewarding smart failures, and celebrating the kind of sideways thinking that makes engineers want to read the manual while accounts workers just give the machine a whack.
Sometimes the whack is exactly what's needed.
Further Resources: